Defendants in Cusip suit make their case for dismissal
Cusip Global Services and its affiliates have filed a joint motion to dismiss the anti-trust class-action lawsuit.
Cusip Global Services (CGS), its operator FactSet, its former operator S&P Global, and its creator and patent-holder the American Bankers Association (ABA), have jointly filed a motion to dismiss the class-action lawsuit brought against them last year, which alleges anti-trust violations and challenges the copyright and licensing structure of the Cusip numbering system.
In the filing, the companies asked that the case be dismissed with prejudice, which, if granted, would spell out a permanent dismissal and ensure that the plaintiffs—New York-based broker-dealer Dinosaur Financial and European real estate investor Swiss Life Investment Management—cannot refile the same charges in the Southern District of New York.
In a rebuttal of the plaintiffs’ most serious assertion—that the foursome has violated sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act—counsel for the accused argue that the licensing structure utilized by CGS, which requires that users, both direct and indirect, pay fees to access and use CGS data, is in accordance with companies’ rights to limit access to their products and services when they have invested time and resources into making them valuable.
They also argue that Dinosaur and Swiss Life have offered no conclusive evidence to show that S&P, FactSet, CGS, and the ABA have done anything to prevent anyone from developing a competing identifier and convincing industry stakeholders and government agencies to adopt it.
The motion to dismiss rests on the argument that data creators have a right to charge for their data; that the right extends to all companies regardless of size or market share; and that the right is not dependent on whether the data (or other services) are copyrightable.
It reads: “In essence, plaintiffs allege that defendants are required to give away data they spent years collecting and updating to help potential rivals including plaintiffs develop competing products.”
The build-up
The suit as it stands today is the result of Judge Katherine Failla’s order to consolidate two competing suits that were filed last year in rapid succession—first by Dinosaur and then by Swiss Life. Both had alleged similar wrongdoings. In addition to standing by the Sherman Act grievances, the co-plaintiffs made further accusations in the amended suit, including breach of contract and violations of New York and Connecticut unfair business practice statutes.
It also alleged CGS, S&P, FactSet, and the ABA had conspired to manipulate the US standard-setting process—Cusip is the national standard for securities identification under the American National Standards Institute’s Accredited Standards Committee X9—to quash would-be competitors to Cusip, such as Bloomberg’s Financial Instrument Global Identifier.
Finally, in the new allegations part of the amended complaint, the plaintiffs argued that the quartet has violated the ABA’s commitment to X9 that it would offer licenses to Cusip numbers on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (Frand) terms, including price, which the suit says was and is a condition of X9’s designation of Cusip as the national standard.
The motion to dismiss also disputes both X9-related allegations, again stating the plaintiffs have not presented, and cannot present, any evidence that CGS and the other companies engaged in any improper conduct at X9 to block competition, and that the plaintiffs have misread or purposefully omitted language that limits any X9-required commitment to patent rights, not copyrights.
“We have long believed that the claims made in the lawsuit are without merit, and now—after the plaintiffs have made several amendments to their original complaint—we still believe strongly that any further litigation would be an unnecessary use of public resources,” said a CGS representative in a statement to WatersTechnology. “Our motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint reflects compelling precedent and case law supporting our longstanding business practices and we will continue to defend our position vigorously. Market participants around the world recognize and value the transparency, efficiency, and reliability the Cusip system delivers to the global capital markets, and we remain focused on that mission every day.”
The plaintiffs will have a deadline of April 3, 2023, to respond to the motion. The defendants will have a further deadline of April 27, 2023, to make their case for dismissal once again before the judge rules on whether to let the case proceed to trial, as requested by the plaintiffs.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
The IMD Wrap: Talkin’ ’bout my generation
As a Gen-Xer, Max tells GenAI to get off his lawn—after it's mowed it, watered it and trimmed the shrubs so he can sit back and enjoy it.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: The issue with corporate actions
Yogita Mehta from SIX joins to discuss the biggest challenges firms face when dealing with corporate actions.
Data catalog competition heats up as spending cools
Data catalogs represent a big step toward a shopping experience in the style of Amazon.com or iTunes for market data management and procurement. Here, we take a look at the key players in this space, old and new.
This Week: JP Morgan, Broadridge, Lloyds, JSE, Schroders, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
What firms should know ahead of the DSB’s UPI launch
Six jurisdictions have set deadlines for firms to implement the derivatives identifier, with more expected to follow.
Has cloud cracked the multicast ‘holy grail’ for exchanges?
An examination of how exchanges—already migrating to the cloud—are working to solve the problem of multicasting in a new environment.
Waters Wrap: Market data spend and nice-to-have vs. need-to-have decisions
Cost is not the top factor driving the decision to switch data providers. Anthony looks at what’s behind the evolution of spending priorities.
The consolidated tapes are taking shape—but what shape exactly?
With political appetite established on both sides of the Channel, attention is turning to the technical details.